Home/Articles/Methods and Procedure of State Property Privatization

Methods and Procedure of State Property Privatization

← Previous Next →

Privatization of state property is one of the key directions of reforms in the Republic of Uzbekistan, ensuring the transition to a market economy, increasing the efficiency of asset management, and developing a competitive environment. The adoption of the new Law “On Privatization of State Property” (ZRU-907) marks a qualitative stage in the evolution of privatization policy, enshrining modern mechanisms for the sale of state assets that take into account international standards of transparency, accountability, and anti-corruption measures.

In Uzbek legislation, privatization is defined as the sale of state property to individuals and non-state legal entities in the prescribed manner. Objects of privatization include state real estate (including enterprises, buildings, structures, and unfinished construction projects), state shares (stocks, participatory interests), and state institutions.

An important element is the differentiation of privatization methods depending on the specifics of the object, its socio-economic significance, and the state’s strategic priorities.

Main Methods of Privatization

1. Auction

The most universal and transparent method, providing for an increase in the starting price during online electronic bidding. The winner is the participant who offers the highest price. It applies to property that does not require additional operating conditions.

2. Tender (Competitive Bidding)

Used when the buyer is assigned specific obligations (for example, modernization, job preservation). Proposals are evaluated on a 100-point scale, with up to 80 points allocated for the price offer and up to 20 points for non-financial conditions.

3. Public Invitation to Negotiations

A method aimed at attracting a wide range of investors. The process is carried out in several stages: submission of applications, familiarization with data, submission of non-binding and then binding offers, negotiations, and selection of the winner. It is characterized by a high degree of flexibility.

4. Competitive Dialogue

Applied when transaction conditions or investment requirements are uncertain. The state body conducts negotiations with each participant, after which it formulates the bidding criteria. This allows for identifying optimal privatization parameters taking into account market interests.

5. Stock Exchange Trading

Provided for the sale of state shares in accordance with securities market legislation. Ensures transparency and market-based pricing.

6. Contribution of State Shares and Real Estate to the Charter Capital of Business Entities

Used both when creating new companies with state participation and when increasing the charter capital of existing companies. This method is aimed at restructuring and capitalizing assets.

7. Privatization of State Institutions

May be carried out through:

  • transformation into business entities,
  • sale as a property complex,
  • contribution of the property complex to the charter capital of a business entity,
  • lease with the condition of subsequent privatization.

8. Lease with Condition of Subsequent Privatization

An innovative method that allows testing management efficiency within a “regulatory sandbox.” It creates conditions for adapting the institution to market realities.

 

Criteria for Selecting the Privatization Method

The choice of a particular method is made by the authorized body taking into account:

  • sectoral and regional characteristics,
  • financial and economic indicators of the enterprise,
  • goals of privatization (maximization of revenue, attraction of investments, preservation of socially significant functions).

International Aspect and Comparative Analysis

The methods presented largely correspond to international practice (auction, tender, public offering, competitive dialogue) but are adapted to national conditions. In particular, the introduction of competitive dialogue and public invitation to negotiations demonstrates the aspiration to create hybrid models that take into account both the state’s interests and those of potential investors.

The new privatization law has enshrined a comprehensive approach to the sale of state property, expanding the toolkit of privatization procedures. This increases regulatory flexibility, ensures equality of participants, strengthens transparency, and reduces corruption risks. The practical implementation of these methods will become an important indicator of the success of reforms aimed at creating a competitive market economy in Uzbekistan.

 

Comparative Table of Privatization Methods

Privatization Method

Conditions of Application

Advantages

Limitations/Risks

Auction

Objects not requiring special operating conditions (except certain construction cases)

Transparency, simplicity, quick market price discovery

Risk of speculative purchases; limited consideration of social and investment obligations

Tender

When it is necessary to impose additional obligations on the buyer (investments, modernization, job preservation)

Considers both price and non-financial conditions; protects social interests

Lengthy procedures; risk of formal treatment of non-financial obligations

Public Invitation to Negotiations

For large/complex objects requiring an individual approach

Attracts a wide range of investors; flexibility of negotiations

High organizational costs; risk of behind-the-scenes arrangements with low transparency

Competitive Dialogue

When sales or investment conditions are uncertain

Allows clarification of deal parameters jointly with investors; flexibility

Prolonged process; need for professional consultants

Stock Exchange Trading

For state shares, under securities market legislation

High transparency; market-based pricing; attracts institutional investors

Susceptibility to stock market fluctuations; limited public access

Contribution to Charter Capital

When creating or increasing the capital of a business entity

Enables restructuring; asset capitalization; preserves state’s share

Risk of dilution of control; challenges in valuation and subsequent management

Privatization of State Institutions

Institutions to be transformed, sold, or leased

Flexibility (sale, transformation, lease); ability to preserve functions through lease-with-purchase

Risk of social tension (e.g., when institutions are closed); need for succession of labor relations

Lease with Subsequent Privatization

For testing in a “regulatory sandbox”

Gradual adaptation; ability to assess management effectiveness

Risk of delaying privatization; need for strict tenant control

 

Procedure of State Property Privatization

1. Development of Privatization Programs

  • Initiators: Authorized state body (State Assets Management Agency – SAMA) and its territorial departments.
  • Basis: Proposals from state bodies, local authorities, as well as individuals and legal entities.
  • Types of programs:
  • Privatization program for republican property (approved by the Cabinet of Ministers),
  • Privatization programs for municipal property (approved by local authorities).
  • Special feature: certain objects may be privatized directly at market value on the basis of Presidential acts.

2. Preparation for Privatization

  • A “roadmap” is developed, specifying conditions, stages, deadlines, and valuation procedure.
  • Inventory, valuation, and review of the valuation report are carried out.
  • Measures may be applied to increase investment attractiveness (restructuring, infrastructure improvements).
  • Professional consultants (appraisers, lawyers, auditors) may be engaged.
  • For large enterprises, an expert group may be created.

3. Restrictions During Privatization

  • From the date of the program’s adoption, alienation, write-off, pledge, or other disposition of the property included in the program is prohibited, except as expressly provided for in the “roadmap.”

4. Determination of the Starting Price

  • Based on a report from an independent appraisal organization.
  • The authorized body has the right to adjust the price considering market conditions.
  • For transactions involving international audit firms, additional review of the report is not required.

5. Selection and Implementation of Privatization Method

  • The method (auction, tender, public invitation to negotiations, competitive dialogue, stock exchange trading, etc.) is selected by the authorized body.
  • Bidding is organized through electronic online platforms.
  • Participants are required to make a deposit of 3% to 15% of the starting price depending on the object’s value.
  • The winner is determined according to the criteria of the chosen method (price, conditions, investment obligations).

6. Execution of the Sale and Purchase Agreement

  • The contract is executed electronically.
  • Mandatory provisions: price, procedure and terms of payment, rights and obligations of the parties, liability, guarantees.
  • The balance holder of the object must sign the acceptance-transfer act within 5 working days.

7. Payment and Installments

  • General payment term – 1 month.
  • An installment plan of up to 36 months may be provided (depending on the size of the transaction).
  • If installments exceed 65% of the amount, they must be secured by an insurance policy or bank guarantee.

8. Registration of Ownership Rights

  • After fulfillment of obligations, a state order or a depository account statement (for shares) is issued.
  • Ownership rights include the non-agricultural land plot associated with the object.

9. Monitoring and Control

  • The authorized body monitors compliance with contract terms (payment schedule, investment obligations, object operation).
  • In case of breach, penalties apply; mediation or court proceedings are possible.
  • The statute of limitations for disputes is 3 years.

10. Publicity and Reporting

  • Information on each object is published at least 30 days before the start of bidding.
  • Bidding results, including buyer data and price, are published within 3 working days.
  • The authorized body annually publishes a consolidated privatization report by April 1.

 

Roadmap for State Property Privatization

Stage

Actions

Responsible Authorities

Deadlines

1. Formation of Privatization Program

Collection of proposals, definition of the list of objects, preparation of the program (republican or municipal)

SAMA, territorial departments, Cabinet of Ministers, local authorities

Before program approval (set by the authority)

2. Approval of Program

Approval by the Cabinet of Ministers (republican level) or local councils (municipal level)

Cabinet of Ministers, Jokargy Kenes of Karakalpakstan, Councils of People’s Deputies

During the planning procedure

3. Preparation of Object “Roadmap”

Definition of conditions, stages, deadlines, valuation and review, increasing investment attractiveness

SAMA, territorial departments, engaged consultants

Within 3 working days after roadmap approval – communicated to executors

4. Inventory and Valuation

Conducting inventory, engaging appraisal organizations, determining starting price

SAMA, territorial departments, independent appraisers

Before placing on auction

5. Publication of Information

Announcement of object (data, starting price, conditions) in media and websites

SAMA, auction organizer

At least 30 days before bidding

6. Conduct of Bidding/Negotiations

Organization of auction, tender, public invitation to negotiations, competitive dialogue, or stock exchange trading

SAMA, e-trading platform operator, consultants

Depends on method (usually 10–60 days)

7. Determination of Winner

Selection of winner by price and/or conditions, drafting of protocol

SAMA, auction operator

On the day of bidding completion

8. Execution of Sale and Purchase Agreement

Signing of contract electronically, agreement on terms, signing of acceptance-transfer act

SAMA, territorial departments, buyer, balance holder

Within 10 working days after bidding

9. Payment for Property

Payments made: lump sum (1 month) or installments (up to 36 months)

Buyer; control – SAMA

1–36 months depending on transaction amount

10. Registration of Ownership

Issuance of state order or depository account statement

SAMA, public service centers

Within 5 working days after full payment

11. Monitoring of Obligations

Control of contract conditions (payments, investments, object operation)

SAMA, territorial departments

Until full performance of obligations

12. Public Reporting

Publication of bidding results and annual reports

SAMA, auction operator

Results – within 3 days, consolidated report – annually by April 1

 

Our address
26, Passage 2, Tarakkiyot Street,
Tashkent city, Uzbekistan
Leave a request
Ask your question
Indicates required fields
Your name:*
Indicates required fields
Your phone:*
Indicates required fields
Your E-mail:*
Indicates required fields
Comments:*
Indicates required fields
Я согласен(а) с обработкой персональных данных*
Спасибо! Ваш запрос отправлен