Modern trends in the digitalization of the economy and public administration have necessitated the transition to electronic forms of procurement. In the Republic of Uzbekistan, one of the tools ensuring transparency and efficiency of public procurement is the electronic store — a competitive method of purchasing goods, works, and services that are not subject to specific requirements. Its legal regulation is enshrined in the Law "On Public Procurement" (Law No. ZRU-684 of April 22, 2021).
According to the law, an electronic store is a special platform within the electronic public procurement system, where public offers of participants are formed and the customer selects the most advantageous proposal. It is part of the electronic procurement system and serves as a tool for:
Criteria for the Use of the Electronic Store
The law establishes maximum contract values:
Limits are also set on the purchase of homogeneous goods and services during a fiscal year. These restrictions are aimed at preventing the splitting of procurements and avoiding competitive procedures.
Mechanism of Functioning
The electronic store is based on a system of public offers submitted by suppliers. Each offer must contain:
The public customer selects the desired proposal and initiates the price request mechanism. The system automatically sends notifications to other suppliers of similar goods, which stimulates price reductions. The final contract is generated automatically at the lowest price offered during the process.
Advantages of the Electronic Store
Problems and Challenges
Despite the obvious advantages, the practice of applying the electronic store faces a number of issues:
Development Prospects
To improve the effectiveness of the electronic store, it is advisable to:
The electronic store is an innovative tool in Uzbekistan’s public procurement system, ensuring transparency, budget savings, and increased competition among suppliers. Its further development is directly linked to the improvement of the regulatory framework, digital infrastructure, and control mechanisms.
Comparison Between the Electronic Store and Tender
|
Criterion |
Electronic Store |
Tender |
|
Legal basis |
Law "On Public Procurement" (Chapter 5) |
Law "On Public Procurement" (Chapter 4, Articles 30, 32) |
|
Purpose |
Procurement of standard goods (works, services) not requiring specific conditions |
Procurement of complex and/or high-value goods, works, and services |
|
Cost threshold |
Goods: up to 25,000 BCUs (budget customers — up to 2,500 BCUs); Works/services: up to 100 BCUs (budget customers — up to 50 BCUs) |
No cost limits, applied for large and complex procurements |
|
Participants |
Any suppliers posting public offers |
Pre-qualified participants submitting tender proposals |
|
Form of participation |
Posting public offers + price request (automated process) |
Submission of tender documentation, review by commission |
|
Winner selection |
Automatically, based on the lowest price among proposals |
By procurement commission, based on a set of criteria (price, quality, timing, etc.) |
|
Procedure speed |
High (several days) |
Long (weeks or months depending on procurement complexity) |
|
Transparency |
Full: all offers are available in the system, negotiations excluded |
High, but requires commission work and protocol procedures |
|
Risks |
- False information in offers - Splitting procurements to bypass tenders |
- Subjective influence of commission - Higher corruption risks if insufficiently controlled |
|
Flexibility |
Suitable for mass and recurring procurements (stationery, furniture, consumables) |
Suitable for unique, technically complex, and innovative procurements |
|
Result |
Automatically generated contract at the minimum price |
Contract with the participant offering the best overall conditions |
Legal Restrictions on the Use of the Electronic Store
The Law "On Public Procurement" explicitly defines the scope of the electronic store, thereby limiting its application.
1. Value restrictions
Procurement through the electronic store is not allowed if:
Thus, large and costly procurements are directly allocated to other procedures — tenders or two-stage bidding.
2. Specific and complex procurements
The electronic store is designed only for typical goods and standard services. Not allowed are procurements that:
Such procurements must be carried out through tender or two-stage procedures.
3. Procurements related to security and secrecy
The electronic store cannot be used for procurements related to:
4. Volume restrictions
Even if each transaction complies with the limits, homogeneous goods and services are subject to cumulative annual limits:
This means that procurements cannot be artificially “split” to bypass tenders.
Conclusion:
Procurements through the electronic store are not allowed if they: