The authorized capital (charter capital) of a joint-stock company (JSC) is one of the key elements of its legal status and financial stability. Under the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the authorized capital is considered as the aggregate of property rights and obligations of shareholders expressed in shares, and it performs a guarantee function in relation to the company’s creditors.
According to the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Joint-Stock Companies and Protection of Shareholders’ Rights” (new edition of 2014), the authorized capital is formed from the nominal value of shares placed among shareholders. All shares must have the same nominal value, ensuring equality of shareholders in terms of property rights.
The authorized capital serves as the minimum property security for creditors’ interests, as its amount determines the lower boundary of the company’s assets necessary to cover its liabilities.
Formation of Authorized Capital
Changes to Authorized Capital
Impact on Shareholders’ Rights
Authorized Capital and Net Assets
The law links the size of the authorized capital to the amount of the company’s net assets. If, at the end of the reporting year, the net assets are less than the authorized capital, the company must either reduce the capital to the level of net assets or decide to liquidate.
The authorized capital of a JSC in Uzbekistan performs not only organizational, legal, and financial functions but also serves as an important tool for protecting the interests of creditors and shareholders. It reflects the minimum level of the company’s property liability and serves as the foundation for its economic activities. Legislation provides strict rules for the formation, increase, and reduction of the authorized capital to ensure a balance of interests among all corporate participants.
Formation, Increase, and Reduction of Authorized Capital
|
Element |
Formation |
Increase |
Reduction |
|
Legal basis |
Founding agreement, company charter, Law “On JSCs” |
Decision of the general meeting or supervisory board (if authorized by the charter) |
Decision of the general meeting of shareholders |
|
Time limits |
Full formation within 1 year of state registration |
Defined by the decision on additional share issuance |
Defined by the general meeting and fixed in the charter |
|
Sources |
Founders’ contributions: cash, property, property rights |
- Additional shares (investments) - Own capital - Accrued dividends |
- Reduction of nominal value - Decrease in number of shares (buyback and cancellation) |
|
Shareholder participation |
Founders pay for all shares upon establishment |
Existing shareholders have preemptive rights to new shares |
All shareholders are affected proportionally |
|
Restrictions |
Minimum size may be set for certain licensed activities |
- Additional shares only within declared number - Preferred shares ≤ 25% of capital |
Cannot be reduced below statutory minimum; creditors may demand early fulfillment |
|
Consequences |
Legal status acquired; capital secures property base |
Expands financial capacity, attracts investment, increases shareholder rights |
Reduces financial base, potential creditor claims, weaker guarantees |
Methods of Forming Authorized Capital
1. Cash Contributions
Most common method — shareholders contribute funds in national currency (UZS).
Advantages: transparency, liquidity, quick formation of capital.
2. Property Contributions
Contributions may include buildings, equipment, transport, or land (if allowed by law).
Property must be monetarily valued and recorded in founding documents. If the value exceeds 200 times the base calculation value (BCV), independent valuation is required.
3. Property Rights
May include intellectual property (patents, trademarks, copyrights), contractual claims, or long-term usage rights.
Such rights must be monetarily valued and recorded in founding documents.
4. State Assets
If a JSC is created through reorganization of a state enterprise, its authorized capital is based on state property.
Valuation is conducted per Cabinet of Ministers procedure; creation is approved by a state authority.
5. Mixed Method
Combination of cash and property contributions ensures both liquidity and material base.
Comparative Table of Capital Formation Methods
|
Method |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
|
Cash |
High liquidity, simple accounting |
No immediate material base |
|
Property |
Creates material foundation |
Requires valuation, potential disputes |
|
Property rights |
Enables use of intangible assets |
Valuation complexity, low liquidity |
|
State assets |
Supports strategic industries |
Dependent on state decisions |
|
Mixed |
Combines benefits |
Complex accounting and control |
Stages of Authorized Capital Formation
|
Stage |
Description |
Legal Basis / Note |
|
1. Decision to establish |
Founders decide on size, type, and distribution of shares |
Formalized by founding meeting |
|
2. Founding agreement |
Defines contributions and share allocation |
Required with multiple founders |
|
3. Valuation of contributions |
Cash contributions and property valuation |
Independent valuation if >200 BCV |
|
4. Payment for shares |
Payment in cash or property |
Within 1 year after registration |
|
5. State registration |
Submission to registering authority |
JSC obtains legal status |
|
6. Full formation |
Authorized capital fully formed within one year |
Noncompliance may lead to liquidation |
|
7. Accounting reflection |
Entries in accounting records |
In accordance with accounting rules |
Changes in Authorized Capital
1. General Characteristics
Authorized capital is not fixed permanently — it may be increased or decreased. All changes must be registered with the state.
2. Increase of Authorized Capital
3. Reduction of Authorized Capital
4. Procedure
5. Legal and Economic Significance
Increase strengthens financial stability and investor trust; reduction may signal financial distress but helps align assets and capital.
Comparison of Increase vs. Reduction
|
Criterion |
Increase |
Reduction |
|
Purpose |
Attract investment, expand operations |
Align capital with assets, return funds, financial recovery |
|
Methods |
Additional shares, profit capitalization, new investors, debt conversion |
Lower nominal value, reduce shares |
|
Decision-making body |
General meeting or supervisory board |
Only general meeting |
|
Procedure |
Within declared shares; preemptive rights |
Reasons must be stated; not below legal minimum |
|
Registration |
Amendments and state registration |
Amendments and state registration |
|
Shareholder rights |
Preemptive rights; increase ownership |
Possible refund; decreased share value |
|
Creditor rights |
Indirectly stronger guarantees |
Right to early repayment within 30 days |
|
Consequences |
Growth, financial expansion |
Reduced guarantees, possible trust loss |
Rights of Shareholders and Creditors during Capital Changes
|
Change |
Shareholders’ Rights |
Creditors’ Rights |
|
Increase |
Preemptive right to buy new shares; increased participation; higher dividend potential |
Indirectly benefit via stronger guarantees |
|
Reduction |
Participate in decisions; may receive partial refund; reduced share value |
May demand early repayment and compensation within 30 days; increased monitoring |
In summary:
Shareholders benefit from capital increases through expanded rights and income potential, but face risks when capital decreases.
Creditors are primarily interested in maintaining or increasing capital levels, and the law protects them with the right to demand early repayment in case of reduction.